
Maximum Compensation.
Work vans, tree-trim trucks, and other commercial vehicles — not 18-wheeler trucking
We respond in ~15 minutes
If a commercial vehicle that is not an 18-wheeler injured you in Denver or anywhere in Colorado, Conduit Law handles the PI claim: company coverage, employer liability, and the proof the file actually needs.
Denver Commercial Vehicle Accident Lawyers for Colorado PI Claims
A crash with a work van, a landscaping truck, a tree-trimming bucket truck, a local delivery van, or another company-owned vehicle is still a Colorado personal injury claim. It is not automatically an 18-wheeler trucking case. The vehicle may carry a commercial auto policy, the driver may have been on the clock, and the employer may share responsibility — but the investigation is built around that company vehicle and that crash, not FMCSA hours-of-service logs for a tractor-trailer.
If you were hit by a semi, big rig, or interstate motor carrier, use our Denver truck accident attorneys. This page is for commercial vehicles that are not that: tree-trim and arborist trucks, chipper trucks, landscaping and construction work vans, utility trucks, box vans used by local businesses, and similar company vehicles on Denver and Front Range roads.
Conduit Law is a Denver personal injury firm. Founding attorney Elliot Singer works these files the same way he works every serious crash: kind with the client, precise with the coverage, and unwilling to let the first company explanation close the claim. Call (720) 432-7032 for a free consultation. No fee unless we win.
What Counts as a Commercial Vehicle Here
For this practice area, “commercial vehicle” means a vehicle used in a business that is not being handled as an 18-wheeler / motor-carrier trucking case. Common Colorado examples include:
- Tree-trimming and arborist vehicles: bucket trucks, chipper trucks, and crew vehicles used in tree work.
- Landscaping and property-maintenance trucks: work trucks and trailers moving equipment between jobs.
- Work vans and local delivery vans: contractor vans, service vans, and company cargo vans.
- Utility and municipal work vehicles: company trucks that are not interstate semis.
The label on the door is not the whole legal question. The questions that move the file are: who owned the vehicle, who employed the driver, what policy applies, and what the physical evidence shows about the crash.
Tree-Trim and Other Company-Vehicle Crashes
Tree-trimming and landscaping outfits run bucket trucks, chippers, and crew vehicles through Denver neighborhoods and along Front Range corridors. Those vehicles are larger than a passenger car, often sit in travel lanes or block sight lines while a crew works, and they are insured as commercial operations — not as a family auto. When one of those vehicles is involved in an MVA, the claim is a Colorado personal injury case against the driver, the company, or both. It is not an RV case and it is not a trucking docket.
Early work on these files is ordinary and unglamorous: police report, photos, the company name on the vehicle, declarations pages, and whether the driver was working at the time of impact. That is how coverage gets identified. Guessing the vehicle type from a nickname on a website is how results get parked on the wrong page.
Colorado Law That Actually Applies
These are Colorado motor-vehicle injury claims. The filing deadline is generally three years under C.R.S. § 13-80-101. Colorado’s modified comparative negligence rule under C.R.S. § 13-21-111 still applies: recovery is available if you are less than 50 percent at fault, reduced by your share. Non-economic damages in ordinary injury cases are subject to the current statutory cap; economic damages (medical bills, wage loss, future care) are not capped the same way.
If a public entity owned the vehicle, a written notice of claim may be due within 182 days under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. That deadline is separate from the three-year lawsuit deadline. If the crash looks like it involves a city, county, or state vehicle, say so in the first call.
Company vehicles often sit on a commercial auto policy with higher limits than a personal auto policy. That is a coverage fact, not a promise about what any one claim will recover. The number in your case depends on the injuries, the proof, and the policy that actually applies.
How These Claims Are Built
A commercial-vehicle MVA is won or lost on records the company controls. We send preservation letters, identify every applicable policy, and connect the medical timeline to the crash before anyone treats the file like a fender-bender.
- Vehicle and employer: who owned it, who dispatched it, and whether the driver was in the course of employment.
- Coverage: commercial auto, employer liability, and any UM/UIM or MedPay that still applies.
- Scene proof: photos, witness names, body-cam or dash-cam, and the police report.
- Medical proof: treatment from the first exam through MMI, including future care when the record supports it.
If the same crash also involved a passenger car, start with this page when the at-fault vehicle was a company work vehicle, and use our Denver car accident lawyers for ordinary auto claims. Catastrophic injury work still routes through our Denver personal injury lawyers and, when a death is involved, our Denver wrongful death lawyers.
What This Page Is Not
This is not a trucking page. We do not treat a tree-trim MVA as an 18-wheeler case, and we do not park commercial-vehicle results on the car page or the truck page. Interstate motor carriers, FMCSA hours-of-service, and tractor-trailer wrecks belong on the truck page. Ordinary two-car crashes belong on the car page.
Talk to Us
If a work van, tree-trim truck, or other commercial vehicle injured you in Denver or anywhere in Colorado, call (720) 432-7032 or request a free case review. We will tell you which page — and which coverage theory — actually fits the crash. No fee unless we win.
Personal Injury Laws by State — Colorado, Arizona, California & Kansas
Colorado follows a modified comparative negligence system under C.R.S. § 13-21-111, barring recovery if the plaintiff is 50% or more at fault and reducing damages by the plaintiff's fault percentage. Most injury claims: 2 years from the date of injury. Auto collisions: 3 years from the date of crash. Arizona applies pure comparative negligence under A.R.S. § 12-2505, allowing recovery regardless of the plaintiff's fault percentage — even a plaintiff 99% at fault can recover 1% of damages. Arizona's statute of limitations is two years under A.R.S. § 12-542. California also follows pure comparative negligence under CCP § 1431.2, with a two-year filing deadline per CCP § 335.1. Kansas mirrors Colorado's approach with a modified comparative negligence threshold of 50% under K.S.A. § 60-258a, but allows only a two-year filing window under K.S.A. § 60-513. These differences significantly impact case strategy — a plaintiff 55% at fault recovers nothing in Colorado or Kansas but retains a reduced claim in Arizona and California.
Common Questions
Is a tree-trimming truck crash a trucking case?
What if the driver was working when they hit me?
How long do I have to file a commercial-vehicle injury claim in Colorado?
How is this different from a regular car accident claim?
Do you charge a fee to review a commercial-vehicle crash?
Recent Case Results
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each case is unique and results depend on specific facts and circumstances. Settlement amounts shown represent actual recoveries for clients but should not be considered a prediction of results in your case.
Talk to an Attorney
Use the form above, or call now
★1,000+ Colorado families helped
No fees unless we win • 100% confidential
See a range, no email
Answer a few questions about your injuries, treatment, fault, and insurance to see a rough settlement range.
See a range, no emailFree · no email required.
Related Practice Areas
Denver Office
Colorado Crash Reality · 2024
By the Numbers
Behind each of these numbers is a person and a family whose year changed in an instant. We keep them in front of us because understanding how and where Colorado crashes happen is part of building a stronger case — and part of staying safer on the roads you drive every day.
Source: Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), 2024; NHTSA, 2024. Figures reflect the most recent full-year data published at the time of writing.
Injury Law at a Glance — CO, CA, AZ & KS
Three things shape almost every injury claim: how long you have to file, how fault is divided, and what the law lets you recover. They differ by state — here is where the four states we practice in stand.
Colorado
This page- Deadline to file
- 3 years
- C.R.S. § 13-80-101 (motor-vehicle injury)
- Fault rule
- Modified (50% bar)
- You can recover only if you were less than 50% at fault; your award is reduced by your share.
- C.R.S. § 13-21-111
- Damage caps
- Non-economic damages capped
- $1.5M for general injury claims accruing on or after Jan. 1, 2025; medical malpractice is capped separately and lower; re-indexed for inflation starting 2028.
- C.R.S. § 13-21-102.5 (HB 24-1472)
California
- Deadline to file
- 2 years
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1
- Fault rule
- Pure comparative
- You can recover even if you were mostly at fault; your award is reduced by your percentage of fault.
- Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975)
- Damage caps
- No general cap
- No cap on damages in ordinary injury cases. Medical-malpractice non-economic damages are limited by statute and increase each year.
- Cal. Civ. Code § 3333.2
Arizona
- Deadline to file
- 2 years
- A.R.S. § 12-542
- Fault rule
- Pure comparative
- You can recover even if you were mostly at fault; your award is reduced by your percentage of fault.
- A.R.S. § 12-2505
- Damage caps
- No damage caps
- Damage caps are prohibited by the Arizona Constitution.
- Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 31
Kansas
- Deadline to file
- 2 years
- K.S.A. § 60-513
- Fault rule
- Modified (50% bar)
- You can recover only if you were less than 50% at fault; your award is reduced by your share.
- K.S.A. § 60-258a
- Damage caps
- Injury: no cap
- No cap on non-economic damages in injury cases (Hilburn v. Enerpipe, 2019). Wrongful-death nonpecuniary damages are capped at $250,000.
- K.S.A. § 60-1903 (wrongful death)
General information, not legal advice — and deadlines can be shorter for claims against government entities or in special circumstances. Laws change; confirm the deadline that applies to your case with an attorney before relying on it.

